-
Joel Preston Smith replied to the topic ChatGPTs roadmap for learning quantum mechanics in the forum General Discussion 2 years, 3 months ago
Thanks, Mike. I was working on it earlier today, and using ChatGPT occasionally to help me understand concepts:
Give me an overview of Bell’s non-locality theory, simple enough for a child to understand, then show me a list of essays and books, with links to each, that cover the topic.
Bell’s non-locality theory is a scientific idea that helps…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt replied to the topic ChatGPTs roadmap for learning quantum mechanics in the forum General Discussion 2 years, 3 months ago
@joel, see if you can get it to do the homework for March 5th (i.e., work the Bell State problems). Or for that matter any of the stuff leading up to that. And maybe it can tell you something about either “GHZ States” or “Hardy States” (you might add in nonlocality as a keyword).
-
Wayne Dam replied to the topic ChatGPTs roadmap for learning quantum mechanics in the forum General Discussion 2 years, 3 months ago
This is really helpful.
For the coders among us, here’s an interesting Medium article on leveraging ChatGPT in software development.
PRO-GPT | Practical Guide for Programmers using ChatGPT | Part-1
As Programmers, developers and general technology enthusiasts — we understand the importance of staying up-to-date with the latest t…
-
Joel Preston Smith replied to the topic ChatGPTs roadmap for learning quantum mechanics in the forum General Discussion 2 years, 3 months ago
Note that the links I asked for aren’t present in the answer. ChatGPT does this fairly consistently, with regard to ignoring a request for links. It might be a legal issue (to avoid a lawsuit for directing a massive amount of traffic to a site? Wild guess). Or it could be just a way to conserve computational power, since ChatGPT has (according to…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt replied to the topic ChatGPTs roadmap for learning quantum mechanics in the forum General Discussion 2 years, 3 months ago
In my opinion, ChatGPT didn’t give you very good advice. Either with the time allotted or the resources it suggested. But the topics to be studied weren’t too bad. It looks like it mostly just copied an outline from the MIT website.
-
Joel Preston Smith started the topic ChatGPTs roadmap for learning quantum mechanics in the forum General Discussion 2 years, 3 months ago
I’ve been using ChatGPT to get explanations of formulas, concepts (in various fields–not just mathematics), code generation in Python, roadmaps for learning various thing … and and so on (ChatGPT was created by OpenAI.com; it runs in question/answer mode). This is the question and answer I got today, regarding a plan for learning quantum…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt started the topic Kickoff for 2023 Quantum Theory series in the forum Announcements 2 years, 3 months ago
Hi Everyone,
We’re getting ready to start our 2023 series on Quantum Theory. This will hopefully include some topics on “interpretations” (that is, what does quantum physics say about the nature of the world we inhabit). For example, we’ll be discussing the non-locality question: Does quantum physics imply that there is some kind of “action…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt replied to the topic March 5: Quantum Theory Warm-up / Q&A in the forum Background Study 2 years, 3 months ago
In case anyone is going to attempt the Bell State problems, here are the 45 degree (one bit) basis vectors:
The 45 degree operator is:
It’s eigenvectors are:…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt started the topic March 5: Quantum Theory Warm-up / Q&A in the forum Background Study 2 years, 3 months ago
We’re getting ready to start our 2023 series on Quantum Theory. This will hopefully include some topics on “interpretations” (that is, what does quantum physics say about the nature of the world we inhabit). For example, we’ll be discussing the non-locality question: Does quantum physics imply that there is some kind of “action at a…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt started the topic Sunday Feb 19th: Help us test some new equipment in the forum Announcements 2 years, 3 months ago
We’ve got some new equipment that we need to test out with Zoom. Everything works OK locally, but things often look different online. So if anyone is available to help us out with this, please join in this afternoon.
We made a one-off meeting for this, so it doesn’t have the regular link. Here’s all the information:
Physics Cafe is inviting y…[Read more]
-
Mike Witt started the topic Test after messing with PHP in the forum Test Forum 2 years, 4 months ago
This notification should show up in php_mail.log.
Tagging @mike just to make sure one goes out. -
Mike Witt replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 4 months ago
OK. I updated the Meetings page. I left a placeholder there for this coming Sunday.
-
John Scott replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 4 months ago
Works for me too. I can tell the others when we meet Sunday that we’re having a specialized talk that day and they don’t need to come if they don’t want to.
-
Mike Witt replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 4 months ago
Right.
-
Wayne Dam replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 4 months ago
Sure. So this will be at 3 pm Vancouver time?
-
Mike Witt replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 4 months ago
How about if I schedule this for Feb 5th? Usual time, etc.
-
John Scott replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 5 months ago
Those times will usually work for me too.
-
Wayne Dam replied to the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 5 months ago
All Sundays after 1 pm are clear for me.
-
Mike Witt started the topic The PhysicsCafe.org Website in the forum Meetings 2 years, 5 months ago
We’re planning to have a meeting to discuss various aspects of our website. This is primarily intended for people who want to be able to do “admin” type activities on the site (edit the Meetings page and things like that). But we can also discuss any issues about the site that anyone wants to bring up.
As of the time I’m writing this, we haven’t…[Read more]
-
John Scott replied to the topic latex test in the forum Test Forum 2 years, 5 months ago
$The notation (s) = { sx | x in R}.
And (r,s) = {rx + sy | x,y in R}. This is by definition. I don’t know if Eliot defines this yet.
So your example of (2,x) in Z[x] is: (2,x) = {2 f(x) + x g(x) | f,g in Z[x]}.
But looking at (2) + (x) this is {2 f(x) | f in Z[x]} + {x g(x) | g in Z[x]}, where we are adding the sets by adding all possible…[Read more] - Load More